Migrate from GRDB 5 to GRDB 6 #36
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces significant updates to the GRDB.swift dependency, upgrading it from version 5.26.1 to 6.29.3 in both Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- Package.resolved (1 hunks)
- Package.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Box/BoxIdentifierCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/DirectoryIdCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat6/VaultFormat6ShortenedNameCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat7/VaultFormat7ShortenedNameCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/GoogleDrive/GoogleDriveIdentifierCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/OneDrive/OneDriveIdentifierCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/PCloud/PCloudIdentifierCache.swift (1 hunks)
- Tests/CryptomatorCloudAccessTests/Common/DirectoryContentCacheTests.swift (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (9)
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Box/BoxIdentifierCache.swift (1)
16-16: Excellent improvement in error handling!The changes in the
initmethod declaration and the initialization ofinMemoryDBusingtry DatabaseQueue()are great improvements in terms of error handling. By addingthrowsto the method declaration and usingtrywhen initializinginMemoryDB, you ensure that any errors encountered during the creation of theDatabaseQueueare properly propagated and can be handled by the callers ofinit.This enhances the robustness of the code and makes it clear to the callers that they need to handle any potential errors that may occur during initialization.
Consider adding a
do-catchblock or usingtry?when callinginitto handle any errors that may be thrown. For example:do { let cache = try BoxIdentifierCache() // Use the cache } catch { // Handle the error }or
let cache = try? BoxIdentifierCache() if let cache = cache { // Use the cache } else { // Handle the error }Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/PCloud/PCloudIdentifierCache.swift (1)
17-17: Improved error handling during initialization. LGTM!The addition of
tryduringDatabaseQueueinstantiation and marking theinit()method withthrowsenhances the robustness of the code. It ensures that any errors encountered during initialization are properly propagated and handled by the caller.This change aligns with best practices of explicit error handling and improves the overall reliability of the
PCloudIdentifierCacheclass.Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/OneDrive/OneDriveIdentifierCache.swift (1)
16-16: Excellent improvement in error handling!The change to include error handling during the initialization of
DatabaseQueueis a great enhancement. It ensures that any errors that may occur during the setup of the database connection are properly propagated and can be handled by the caller of theinit()method.This aligns with the PR objective of updating error handling mechanisms and improves the overall reliability and robustness of the code.
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/GoogleDrive/GoogleDriveIdentifierCache.swift (1)
16-16: Improved error handling during initialization.The change introduces explicit error handling when initializing the
inMemoryDBproperty usingtry DatabaseQueue(). This is a good practice as it ensures that any errors encountered during the initialization are propagated to the caller, allowing them to handle the error appropriately.By using
try, the code acknowledges that the initialization can fail and provides a clear indication to the caller that they need to handle the potential error. This improves the robustness and reliability of the code by preventing the creation of an invalidGoogleDriveIdentifierCacheinstance if the database initialization fails.Great job on enhancing the error handling! 👍
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/DirectoryIdCache.swift (1)
32-32: Improved error handling forDatabaseQueueinitialization.The change to include error handling for
DatabaseQueueinitialization using thetrykeyword is a positive improvement. It ensures that any errors encountered during the initialization are appropriately managed, enhancing the robustness of the code.This aligns with the PR objective of updating error handling mechanisms and follows best practices for error management.
Package.swift (1)
40-40: Ensure compatibility with GRDB 6.x.Updating to a new major version of GRDB is a significant change that may introduce breaking changes or require code modifications.
Please ensure the following:
Thoroughly test the application to verify compatibility with GRDB 6.x and identify any issues that may arise due to the version upgrade.
Review the GRDB 6.x migration guide and release notes to understand the changes, potential code modifications required, and new features that can be leveraged.
Make necessary code changes to align with the new version and address any deprecations or breaking changes.
Consider updating the project's README or documentation to reflect the new GRDB version requirement and any notable changes or improvements it brings.
Let me know if you need any assistance with the migration process or have any specific concerns!
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat6/VaultFormat6ShortenedNameCache.swift (1)
51-51: Improved error handling during database queue initialization.The change from
DatabaseQueue()totry DatabaseQueue()enhances the robustness of the code by explicitly handling potential errors during the database queue initialization. If the initialization fails, the error will be propagated and can be caught and handled by the caller of theinitmethod.This change aligns with the error handling approach used in the rest of the
initmethod, ensuring consistency and improving the overall reliability of the code.Tests/CryptomatorCloudAccessTests/Common/DirectoryContentCacheTests.swift (1)
32-32: LGTM! The change aligns with the migration to GRDB 6.The modification to the
inMemoryDBinitialization handles the new error-throwing behavior of theDatabaseQueueinitializer introduced in GRDB 6. The use oftryensures proper error propagation and handling within the test setup.Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat7/VaultFormat7ShortenedNameCache.swift (1)
109-109: Excellent addition of error handling!The introduction of the
trykeyword forDatabaseQueue()initialization ensures that any potential errors during the database queue creation are properly propagated and handled. This change improves the robustness and reliability of the code by explicitly managing initialization failures.Furthermore, the addition of the
throwskeyword to the initializer signature correctly propagates the error to the caller, ensuring comprehensive error handling throughout the codebase.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Box/BoxItem.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/DirectoryIdCache.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat6/VaultFormat6ShortenedNameCache.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat7/VaultFormat7ShortenedNameCache.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/OneDrive/OneDriveItem.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/PCloud/PCloudItem.swift (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/DirectoryIdCache.swift
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat6/VaultFormat6ShortenedNameCache.swift
- Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Crypto/VaultFormat7/VaultFormat7ShortenedNameCache.swift
Additional comments not posted (2)
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/Box/BoxItem.swift (1)
Line range hint
39-43: LGTM! Verify the impact of the function signature change.The addition of the
throwskeyword to theencode(to:)function is a good change that enhances the error handling capabilities of the function. However, this is a breaking change for existing callers of this function.Please ensure that all callers of this function have been updated to handle the potential errors thrown by this function. You can use the following script to verify the impact of this change:
Verification successful
LGTM, but ensure thorough testing of persistence-related functionality
The addition of
throwsto theencode(to:)method inBoxItemis consistent with otherencode(to:)implementations in the codebase. However, given the widespread use ofBoxItemthroughout the project, particularly inBoxCloudProvider.swift, this change could have a significant impact.While direct calls to
encode(to:)onBoxIteminstances are not visible in the provided code, the method is likely used implicitly through thePersistableRecordprotocol. To ensure the change doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior:
- Thoroughly test all persistence-related functionality, especially in
BoxCloudProvider.- Update any documentation for the
PersistableRecordprotocol to reflect that conforming types should implement a throwingencode(to:)method.- Review and update error handling in any code that indirectly uses
BoxItem'sencode(to:)method through thePersistableRecordprotocol.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all callers of the `encode(to:)` function have been updated to handle errors. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences to use `try` or handle errors. rg --type swift -A 5 $'BoxItem\(\)\.encode\(to:'Length of output: 49
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather more information about BoxItem and encode(to:) usage # Search for BoxItem class declaration echo "BoxItem class declaration:" ast-grep --lang swift --pattern 'class BoxItem' # Search for encode(to:) usage on BoxItem instances echo "\nBoxItem encode(to:) usage:" rg --type swift -A 5 '\.encode\(to:' | grep -i 'boxitem' # Search for other encode(to:) implementations echo "\nOther encode(to:) implementations:" ast-grep --lang swift --pattern 'func encode(to $_: inout $_) $_'Length of output: 1186
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further investigation of BoxItem and encode(to:) usage # Search for BoxItem definition echo "BoxItem definition:" rg --type swift -i 'class BoxItem|struct BoxItem|protocol BoxItem' # Search for any mention of BoxItem echo "\nBoxItem mentions:" rg --type swift -i 'BoxItem' # Search for encode(to:) implementations with adjusted pattern echo "\nencode(to:) implementations:" rg --type swift 'func encode\(to .+: inout .+\)' # Search for Encodable conformance echo "\nEncodable conformance:" rg --type swift ': Encodable'Length of output: 8869
Sources/CryptomatorCloudAccess/PCloud/PCloudItem.swift (1)
Line range hint
49-53: LGTM!The change to the
encode(to:)function signature to include thethrowskeyword is a good practice for error handling. It allows the function to propagate errors to its callers, which can help with better error management in the codebase.The function body remains unchanged, and there are no apparent issues with the logic or syntax.
Migrate the project from GRDB 5 to GRDB 6, addressing issue #35 by updating database interactions and error handling to align with the latest GRDB changes.