Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ERC-6381: typo fix Update erc-6381.md #866

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update ERC-6381: typo fix Update erc-6381.md #866

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
92e3a35
docs: typo fix Update erc-6381.md
famouswizard Jan 25, 2025
78b3c46
Merge branch 'master' into patch-1
lightclient Feb 19, 2025
1447ea8
Merge branch 'master' into patch-1
lightclient Feb 19, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion ERCS/erc-6381.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ The proposal only accepts the Unicode identifier which is a `bytes4` value. This
2. **Should the proposal use emojis to relay the impressions of NFTs or some other method?**\
The impressions could have been done using user-supplied strings or numeric values, yet we decided to use emojis since they are a well established mean of relaying impressions and emotions.
3. **Should the proposal establish an emotable extension or a common-good repository?**\
Initially we set out to create an emotable extension to be used with any ERC-721 compilant tokens. However, we realized that the proposal would be more useful if it was a common-good repository of emotable tokens. This way, the tokens that can be reacted to are not only the new ones but also the old ones that have been around since before the proposal.\
Initially we set out to create an emotable extension to be used with any ERC-721 compliant tokens. However, we realized that the proposal would be more useful if it was a common-good repository of emotable tokens. This way, the tokens that can be reacted to are not only the new ones but also the old ones that have been around since before the proposal.\
In line with this decision, we decided to calculate a deterministic address for the repository smart contract. This way, the repository can be used by any NFT collection without the need to search for the address on the given chain.
4. **Should we include only single-action operations, only multi-action operations, or both?**\
We've considered including only single-action operations, where the user is only able to react with a single emoji to a single token, but we decided to include both single-action and multi-action operations. This way, the users can choose whether they want to emote or undo emote on a single token or on multiple tokens at once.\
Expand Down
Loading