Testing LLM reasoning abilities with lineage relationship quizzes.
The project is a successor of the farel-bench benchmark.
The table below presents the benchmark results.
Nr | model_name | lineage | lineage-8 | lineage-16 | lineage-32 | lineage-64 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | openai/o1 | 0.921 | 1.000 | 0.980 | 0.925 | 0.780 |
2 | deepseek/deepseek-r1 | 0.917 | 0.965 | 0.980 | 0.945 | 0.780 |
3 | openai/o3-mini | 0.726 | 0.970 | 0.945 | 0.795 | 0.195 |
4 | deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-32b | 0.613 | 0.805 | 0.685 | 0.595 | 0.365 |
5 | deepseek/deepseek-chat | 0.610 | 0.860 | 0.590 | 0.530 | 0.460 |
6 | openai/o1-mini | 0.562 | 0.955 | 0.820 | 0.400 | 0.075 |
7 | deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-llama-70b | 0.552 | 0.755 | 0.605 | 0.510 | 0.340 |
8 | gemini-exp-1206 | 0.517 | 0.640 | 0.495 | 0.455 | 0.480 |
9 | google/gemini-pro-1.5 | 0.492 | 0.620 | 0.530 | 0.440 | 0.380 |
10 | openai/gpt-4o-2024-11-20 | 0.490 | 0.755 | 0.545 | 0.425 | 0.235 |
11 | meta-llama/llama-3.1-405b-instruct | 0.489 | 0.660 | 0.590 | 0.465 | 0.240 |
12 | qwen/qwq-32b-preview | 0.476 | 0.845 | 0.585 | 0.315 | 0.160 |
13 | mistralai/mistral-large-2411 | 0.475 | 0.695 | 0.510 | 0.360 | 0.335 |
14 | qwen/qwen-max | 0.463 | 0.710 | 0.435 | 0.410 | 0.295 |
15 | meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct | 0.438 | 0.625 | 0.485 | 0.340 | 0.300 |
16 | deepseek/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-14b | 0.426 | 0.830 | 0.600 | 0.195 | 0.080 |
17 | x-ai/grok-2-1212 | 0.405 | 0.580 | 0.395 | 0.360 | 0.285 |
18 | gemini-2.0-flash-thinking-exp-1219 | 0.395 | 0.595 | 0.465 | 0.325 | 0.195 |
19 | minimax/minimax-01 | 0.292 | 0.560 | 0.370 | 0.155 | 0.085 |
20 | gemini-2.0-flash-exp | 0.247 | 0.460 | 0.190 | 0.200 | 0.140 |
21 | anthropic/claude-3.5-sonnet | 0.221 | 0.645 | 0.205 | 0.035 | 0.000 |
Each row contains the average benchmark score across all problem sizes, and separate scores for each problem size.
The purpose of this project is to test LLM reasoning abilities with lineage relationship quizzes.
The general idea is to make LLM reason about a graph of lineage relationships where nodes are people and edges are ancestor/descendant relations between people. LLM is asked to determine the lineage relationship between two people A and B based on the graph. By varying the number of graph nodes (problem size) we can control the quiz difficulty.
There are five possible answers in each quiz:
- A is B's ancestor
- A is B's descendant
- A and B share a common ancestor
- A and B share a common descendant
- None of the above is correct.
The last answer is never correct. It serves only as an invalid fallback answer.
Below you can see some example lineage relationship graphs and corresponding quizzes.
Given the following lineage relationships:
* Joseph is George's ancestor.
* Henry is George's descendant.
* Thomas is Joseph's ancestor.
Determine the lineage relationship between Thomas and Henry.
Select the correct answer:
1. Thomas is Henry's ancestor.
2. Thomas is Henry's descendant.
3. Thomas and Henry share a common ancestor.
4. Thomas and Henry share a common descendant.
5. None of the above is correct.
Enclose the selected answer number in the <ANSWER> tag, for example: <ANSWER>1</ANSWER>.
Given the following lineage relationships:
* Matthew is Heather's ancestor.
* Heather is Melissa's ancestor.
* Matthew is Mark's ancestor.
Determine the lineage relationship between Mark and Melissa.
Select the correct answer:
1. Mark and Melissa share a common ancestor.
2. Mark is Melissa's ancestor.
3. Mark and Melissa share a common descendant.
4. Mark is Melissa's descendant.
5. None of the above is correct.
Enclose the selected answer number in the <ANSWER> tag, for example: <ANSWER>1</ANSWER>.
Given the following lineage relationships:
* Madison is Kathleen's descendant.
* Judith is Madison's ancestor.
* Harold is Kathleen's ancestor.
Determine the lineage relationship between Harold and Judith.
Select the correct answer:
1. Harold and Judith share a common descendant.
2. Harold and Judith share a common ancestor.
3. Harold is Judith's ancestor.
4. Harold is Judith's descendant.
5. None of the above is correct.
Enclose the selected answer number in the <ANSWER> tag, for example: <ANSWER>1</ANSWER>.
The usual workflow is to:
- Run lineage_bench.py to generate lineage relationship quizzes.
- Run run_openrouter.py to test LLM models.
- Run compute_metrics.py to calculate benchmark results.
- Run plot_stacked.py to generate a results plot.
Output is usually written to the standard output. Input is usually read from the standard input.
Example usage:
$ ./lineage_bench.py -s -l 8 -n 10 -r 42|./run_openrouter.py -m "google/gemini-pro-1.5" -t 8 -v|tee results/gemini-pro-1.5_8.csv
$ cat results/*.csv|./compute_metrics.py --csv --relaxed|./plot_stacked.py -o results.png
usage: lineage_bench.py [-h] -l LENGTH [-p PROMPT] [-s] [-n NUMBER] [-r SEED]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-l LENGTH, --length LENGTH
Number of people connected with lineage relationships in the quiz.
-p PROMPT, --prompt PROMPT
Prompt template of the quiz. The default prompt template is: 'Given the following lineage
relationships:\n{quiz_relations}\n{quiz_question}\nSelect the correct answer:\n{quiz_answers}\nEnclose the selected
answer number in the <ANSWER> tag, for example: <ANSWER>1</ANSWER>.'
-s, --shuffle Shuffle the order of lineage relations in the quiz.
-n NUMBER, --number NUMBER
Number of quizzes generated for each valid answer option.
-r SEED, --seed SEED Random seed value
usage: run_openrouter.py [-h] -m MODEL [-p PROVIDER] [-e EFFORT] [-t THREADS] [-v] [-s [SYSTEM_PROMPT]]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-m MODEL, --model MODEL
OpenRouter model name.
-p PROVIDER, --provider PROVIDER
OpenRouter provider name.
-e EFFORT, --effort EFFORT
Reasoning effort (o1 model only).
-t THREADS, --threads THREADS
Number of threads to use.
-v, --verbose Enable verbose output.
-s [SYSTEM_PROMPT], --system-prompt [SYSTEM_PROMPT]
Use given system prompt. By default, the system prompt is not used. When this option is passed without a value, the
default system prompt value is used: 'You are a master of logical thinking. You carefully analyze the premises step by
step, take detailed notes and draw intermediate conclusions based on which you can find the final answer to any
question.'
usage: compute_metrics.py [-h] [-c] [-r] [-d]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-c, --csv Generate CSV output.
-r, --relaxed Relaxed answer format requirements
-d, --detailed Generate detailed output
usage: plot_line.py [-h] [-o OUTPUT]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
Write rendered plot to this file.
usage: plot_stacked.py [-h] [-o OUTPUT]
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
Write rendered plot to this file.