Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

trace: avoid race between event recycling and freeTrace() #75

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jrockway
Copy link

When there are less than 5 events in a trace, the tr.events slice is backed by the tr.eventsBuf array. This leads to a race between the background recycler invocation in unref(). If freeTrace() runs before the recycler goroutine, tr.events just consists of empty event objects when the recycler finally gets to them, and thus the user's recycling function cannot do any useful recycling (as event.What is now nil). So in the case where the array is shared, we make a copy and pass that to the recycler, so that recycling can be done in the background but freeTrace can be run immediately.

Since the copying is only done when there are less than 5 events to copy, it should not have a significant performance impact.

I added a bunch of test cases around this, perhaps too many. And, you will be horrified at how we wait for all the recyclers to run in the test. I did this to avoid modifying the code to add synchronization between the entire recycling operation and the test, and to avoid the test hanging for a long time when it's in the failing state. Suggestions for improvement would be most welcome!

…Trace()

When there are less than 4 events in a trace, tr.events is backed by the tr.eventsBuf array.  This leads
to a race between the background recycler invocation in unref().  Sometimes tr.events just consists of empty
event objects when the recycler finally gets to them.  So in the case where the array is shared, we make a
copy of the events slice, so that recycling can be done in the background but freeTrace can be run immediately.
@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR (HEAD: 5e073f0) has been imported to Gerrit for code review.

Please visit https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/net/+/238302 to see it.

Tip: You can toggle comments from me using the comments slash command (e.g. /comments off)
See the Wiki page for more info

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Gobot Gobot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11 or adds a tag like "wait-release", it means that this CL will be
reviewed as part of the next development cycle. See https://golang.org/s/release
for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/238302.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

@gopherbot
Copy link
Contributor

Message from Go Bot:

Patch Set 1:

Congratulations on opening your first change. Thank you for your contribution!

Next steps:
A maintainer will review your change and provide feedback. See
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#review for more info and tips to get your
patch through code review.

Most changes in the Go project go through a few rounds of revision. This can be
surprising to people new to the project. The careful, iterative review process
is our way of helping mentor contributors and ensuring that their contributions
have a lasting impact.

During May-July and Nov-Jan the Go project is in a code freeze, during which
little code gets reviewed or merged. If a reviewer responds with a comment like
R=go1.11 or adds a tag like "wait-release", it means that this CL will be
reviewed as part of the next development cycle. See https://golang.org/s/release
for more details.


Please don’t reply on this GitHub thread. Visit golang.org/cl/238302.
After addressing review feedback, remember to publish your drafts!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants