Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

draft: CI flakyness test #3483

Closed
wants to merge 24 commits into from
Closed

draft: CI flakyness test #3483

wants to merge 24 commits into from

Conversation

simzzz
Copy link
Contributor

@simzzz simzzz commented Feb 18, 2025

No description provided.

simzzz and others added 24 commits January 28, 2025 14:02
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: nikolay <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simeon Nakov <[email protected]>
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Test Results

 18 files   -  1  236 suites   - 18   32m 58s ⏱️ - 3m 31s
617 tests + 7  613 ✅ + 9  4 💤 ±0  0 ❌  - 2 
633 runs   - 94  629 ✅  - 90  4 💤  - 2  0 ❌  - 2 

Results for commit 3fe4b45. ± Comparison against base commit ef2d8bb.

This pull request removes 1 and adds 8 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
"before all" hook in "@erc20 Acceptance Tests" ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @erc20 Acceptance Tests "before all" hook in "@erc20 Acceptance Tests"
Should allow different accounts associated in the same HbarSpendingPlan to contribute to the same budget ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers EXTENDED Tier Should allow different accounts associated in the same HbarSpendingPlan to contribute to the same budget
Should allow different accounts associated in the same HbarSpendingPlan to contribute to the same budget ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers PRIVILEGED Tier Should allow different accounts associated in the same HbarSpendingPlan to contribute to the same budget
Should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for EXTENDED user and still allow another EXTENDED user to make calls ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers EXTENDED Tier Should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for EXTENDED user and still allow another EXTENDED user to make calls
Should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for PRIVILEGED user and still allow another PRIVILEGED user to make calls ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers PRIVILEGED Tier Should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for PRIVILEGED user and still allow another PRIVILEGED user to make calls
Should increase the amount spent of the spending plan by the transaction cost ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers EXTENDED Tier Should increase the amount spent of the spending plan by the transaction cost
Should increase the amount spent of the spending plan by the transaction cost ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 Preconfigured Tiers PRIVILEGED Tier Should increase the amount spent of the spending plan by the transaction cost
should create a BASIC spending plan for a new user and use the same plan on second transaction and different plan on third transaction from another user ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 BASIC Tier should create a BASIC spending plan for a new user and use the same plan on second transaction and different plan on third transaction from another user
should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for a BASIC user after multiple deployments of large contracts ‑ RPC Server Acceptance Tests Acceptance tests @hbarlimiter HBAR Limiter Acceptance Tests HBAR Rate Limit Tests HBAR Rate Limit For Different Spending Plan Tiers @hbarlimiter-batch2 BASIC Tier should eventually exhaust the hbar limit for a BASIC user after multiple deployments of large contracts

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@simzzz simzzz closed this Feb 18, 2025
@simzzz simzzz deleted the 3155-getCode-to-use-blockNumber branch February 18, 2025 12:15
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.65%. Comparing base (156a858) to head (3fe4b45).
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3483      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.46%   85.65%   +1.19%     
==========================================
  Files          69       69              
  Lines        4751     4734      -17     
  Branches     1059      999      -60     
==========================================
+ Hits         4013     4055      +42     
+ Misses        426      395      -31     
+ Partials      312      284      -28     
Flag Coverage Δ
config-service 95.16% <ø> (-2.99%) ⬇️
relay 79.54% <ø> (+0.25%) ⬆️
server 83.60% <ø> (+0.29%) ⬆️
ws-server 36.31% <ø> (-0.36%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
packages/relay/src/lib/eth.ts 86.37% <ø> (+4.78%) ⬆️

... and 68 files with indirect coverage changes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants