Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make advanced logs error test work in all test environments #5692

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

agners
Copy link
Member

@agners agners commented Feb 28, 2025

Proposed change

When developing/testing in a Supervised environment, the systemd-journal-gatewayd socket is actually available. Mock the socket Path file to make the test independent of the pytest environment.

Type of change

  • Dependency upgrade
  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (which adds functionality to the supervisor)
  • Breaking change (fix/feature causing existing functionality to break)
  • Code quality improvements to existing code or addition of tests

Additional information

  • This PR fixes or closes issue: fixes #
  • This PR is related to issue:
  • Link to documentation pull request:
  • Link to cli pull request:
  • Link to client library pull request:

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.
  • Local tests pass. Your PR cannot be merged unless tests pass
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.
  • I have followed the development checklist
  • The code has been formatted using Ruff (ruff format supervisor tests)
  • Tests have been added to verify that the new code works.

If API endpoints or add-on configuration are added/changed:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced our internal tests by simulating a scenario where a necessary service is unavailable. This improvement reinforces consistent error responses so that users encountering issues continue to receive clear error messages and appropriate status codes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@agners has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 86dff3c and dffa882.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/api/test_host.py (1 hunks)
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The test function test_advanced_logs_errors in tests/api/test_host.py has been updated to employ a context manager that patches the SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYD_SOCKET, simulating its absence before the API call is made. The test then verifies that the API returns an error response with the expected content type, status, and message. No other functional changes or modifications to public interfaces were introduced.

Changes

File Change Summary
tests/api/test_host.py Updated test_advanced_logs_errors: Introduced a context manager to patch SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYD_SOCKET, simulating a missing socket before making the API call, while maintaining existing response assertions.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant T as Test Function
    participant P as Patch Context Manager
    participant A as API Endpoint

    T->>P: Enter patched state (simulate missing socket)
    T->>A: Send API request
    A-->>T: Return error response (400, text/plain)
    T->>T: Assert response details
    T->>P: Exit patched state
Loading

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@agners agners force-pushed the make-advanced-logs-test-work-in-devcontainer branch from 4f8b93d to 86dff3c Compare February 28, 2025 11:25
When developing/testing in a Supervised environment, the
systemd-journal-gatewayd socket is actually available. Mock the
socket Path file to make the test independent of the pytest
environment.
@agners agners force-pushed the make-advanced-logs-test-work-in-devcontainer branch from 86dff3c to dffa882 Compare February 28, 2025 11:27
@agners agners added test Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests and removed chore labels Feb 28, 2025
@agners agners requested a review from sairon February 28, 2025 11:28
@agners agners merged commit f4d69f1 into main Feb 28, 2025
22 checks passed
@agners agners deleted the make-advanced-logs-test-work-in-devcontainer branch February 28, 2025 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed test Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants