Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add comprehensive guide for creating new issue tracker integrations #4069

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mikepsinn
Copy link

This pull request adds a comprehensive guide for creating new issue tracker integrations. Please review the changes in docs/add-new-integration.md.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello there mikepsinn! 👋

Thank you and congrats 🎉 for opening your first PR on this project! ✨ 💖

We will try to review it soon!

@johannesjo johannesjo requested a review from Copilot March 3, 2025 00:24
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This pull request adds a comprehensive documentation guide for creating new issue tracker integrations in Super Productivity.

  • Introduces a detailed step-by-step guide for adding a new provider.
  • Provides example code snippets for models, services, constants, and necessary updates in core files.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
docs/add-new-integration.md New guide outlining the directory structure, required files, and updates for integration registration.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

import { MyProviderCfg } from './my-provider.model';

export const isMyProviderEnabled = (cfg: MyProviderCfg): boolean => {
return cfg && cfg.isEnabled && // other conditions;
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Mar 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The example in the isMyProviderEnabled utility contains a trailing '&&' which would result in a syntax error. Consider completing the expression or removing the operator to provide a valid boolean expression.

Suggested change
return cfg && cfg.isEnabled && // other conditions;
return cfg && cfg.isEnabled && true; // Add other conditions here

Copilot is powered by AI, so mistakes are possible. Review output carefully before use.

Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant