Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛Fix behavior of rate limit option in priorityqueue.AddWithOpts #3103

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zach593
Copy link

@zach593 zach593 commented Feb 6, 2025

func (w *priorityqueue[T]) AddWithOpts(o AddOpts, items ...T) {
w.lock.Lock()
defer w.lock.Unlock()
for _, key := range items {
if o.RateLimited {
after := w.rateLimiter.When(key)
if o.After == 0 || after < o.After {
o.After = after
}
}
var readyAt *time.Time
if o.After > 0 {
readyAt = ptr.To(w.now().Add(o.After))
w.metrics.retry()
}

Since priorityqueue.AddWithOpts() allows adding multiple items, if o.RateLimited is true, the o.After value could get overwritten in the loop and affect subsequent items.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 6, 2025

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: zach593 / name: Zach (ba53477)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zach593
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sbueringer for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Feb 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @zach593. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 6, 2025
@zach593 zach593 force-pushed the fix-AddWithOpts branch 5 times, most recently from 1c4fdff to 102df33 Compare February 6, 2025 16:23
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Feb 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants