-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PodMatchNodeSelector: Replaced PodMatchNodeSelector implementation wi… #1632
Conversation
Hi @jandai. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
ping @a7i @knelasevero |
/ok-to-test |
…th k8s.io/component-helpers to reduce code size and optimize
/retest |
Unnecessary to import |
Yes, this will reduce the complexity of code maintenance. 👍 |
hi, @jandai can you help confirm whether the logic in the k/k package is the same as the logic in the descheduler? Or you have confirmed this clearly? |
I've confirmed it. it matches the NodeSelector and the requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution of nodeAffinity, which do the same thing as implemented by the descheduler. Kindly plz double-check as well |
/lgtm |
/approve Thank you for your contribution! 🏆 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: a7i The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
reduce code size and optimize