Update Ganesha, Fedora and GitHub Actions versions

[Hi-Fi]

No description provided.

[linux-foundation-easycla]

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

• ✅ login: Hi-Fi / name: Juho Saarinen (6f7780c, 913ba74, a28b6be)

[k8s-ci-robot]

Welcome @Hi-Fi!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/nfs-ganesha-server-and-external-provisioner 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/nfs-ganesha-server-and-external-provisioner has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

[ader1990]

A new tag has landed, 6.2, that might fix a critical functionality issue when using Linux kernel >= 6.6 nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha#1188

[Hi-Fi]

OK, I'll check this towards newer Ganesha then.

[ader1990]

Thanks.

[ader1990]

Hello, can we have this PR merged in a timely manner, as there is a big functionality issue that gets fixed by nfs-ganesha v2. See nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha#1188.

Thanks.

[bernardgut]

Hello @kvaps can you merge this ?

thanks

[dadangnh]

Hi @wongma7 / @pohly / @msau42 / @kvaps. Kindly help to review this once you have time.

Thanks

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Hi-Fi
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign wongma7 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[Hi-Fi]

Updated Fedora and Ganesha to latest ones so that PR is not old in dependency sense.

[tanwar57]

Hello, when can we have this PR to be land to use nfs 4.1, I guess on current tag (v4.0.8), we only have nfs version 3

cc @Hi-Fi am I right here . that current nfs version in the latest image is nfs v3

[Hi-Fi]

Hello, when can we have this PR to be land to use nfs 4.1, I guess on current tag (v4.0.8), we only have nfs version 3

cc @Hi-Fi am I right here . that current nfs version in the latest image is nfs v3

@tanwar57 I have done everything I can, PR is waiting for review from owners:

• @wongma7
• @jsafrane
• @kmova
• @ashishranjan738
• @kvaps

This PR would start using NFS 4.1 by default, not sure if that was supported also earlier version but just default was earlier.

EDIT: Builds were made at the fork, and images published to https://github.com/Hi-Fi/nfs-ganesha-server-and-external-provisioner/pkgs/container/nfs-ganesha

[tanwar57]

Hello, when can we have this PR to be land to use nfs 4.1, I guess on current tag (v4.0.8), we only have nfs version 3
cc @Hi-Fi am I right here . that current nfs version in the latest image is nfs v3

@tanwar57 I have done everything I can, PR is waiting for review from owners:

• @wongma7
• @jsafrane
• @kmova
• @ashishranjan738
• @kvaps

This PR would start using NFS 4.1 by default, not sure if that was supported also earlier version but just default was earlier.

@Hi-Fi , I checked actually it is using default v3 . We need this . Thank for your work

[tanwar57]

@Hi-Fi , can you provide me the link of docker image of the provision using default nfs:v4 , do you have it somewhere (like docker hub etc ..)