Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update OWNERS for k/community #8251

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update OWNERS for k/community #8251

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+3 −2

Conversation

jberkus
Copy link
Contributor

@jberkus jberkus commented Jan 15, 2025

  1. Add me to Approvers so that I can continue to help with the backlog
  2. Move Ihor and Paris to Emeritus, since neither is actively reviewing/approving right now.

/sig contributor-experience

attn: @kaslin @mfahlandt @MadhavJivrajani @Priyankasaggu11929

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 15, 2025
@cblecker
Copy link
Member

/hold
for review

As Josh is an emeritus contribex chair with experience in reviewing/approving changes to the whole of this repo, I am +1

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 15, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2025
palnabarun
palnabarun approved these changes Jan 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@palnabarun palnabarun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 16, 2025
@Priyankasaggu11929
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Thanks @jberkus 🙏

@mfahlandt
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

as discussed in the ContribEx Meeting Jan 15th 2025

Thank you @jberkus

justaugustus
justaugustus approved these changes Jan 26, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@justaugustus justaugustus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit on entry sorting, but:
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jberkus, justaugustus, palnabarun

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [justaugustus,palnabarun]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@palnabarun palnabarun palnabarun approved these changes

@justaugustus justaugustus justaugustus approved these changes

@aojea aojea Awaiting requested review from aojea

Assignees

@justaugustus justaugustus

@cblecker cblecker

@mfahlandt mfahlandt

@palnabarun palnabarun

@Priyankasaggu11929 Priyankasaggu11929

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. sig/contributor-experience Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@jberkus @cblecker @Priyankasaggu11929 @mfahlandt @k8s-ci-robot @justaugustus @palnabarun