Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tickets/sitcom 1689 - Facilities Temperatures report #14

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

b1quint
Copy link
Member

@b1quint b1quint commented Oct 18, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@nsevilla nsevilla self-requested a review October 24, 2024 15:02
@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
{
Copy link

@nsevilla nsevilla Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add a couple of sentences description here of what are the 3/4 temperature sensors about.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
{
Copy link

@nsevilla nsevilla Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

top of the plot --> right of the plot?


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this part. The telemetry from MTMount showed to be unliable. I noticed that the temperature reported by MTMount could change by a degree after a state transition. On top of it, it was way too stable for our analysis.

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
{
Copy link

@nsevilla nsevilla Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #68.    heights = {

Are these heights being used? And then the actual heights in the plots seem a bit arbitrary to me. I don't know why Standby should be on top for instance. Makes more sense for the heights to be the ones you have here but they are not used.


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They were at some point. I removed them.

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
{
Copy link

@nsevilla nsevilla Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #89.    ax2.scatter(df_mtmount.index, df_mtmount["summaryState"], marker='|')

The marker could be an 'x' for better visibility.


Reply via ReviewNB

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I tried marker 'x'. However, they overlap a lot. Hence, the choice of '|'. However, I believe this part of the plot will go away.

@@ -0,0 +1,442 @@
{
Copy link

@nsevilla nsevilla Oct 24, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optional really: add more formatting to the output table, so that the time column is Time (UTC) and the temperatures are C, with two significant figures. Same for the other cells below.


Reply via ReviewNB

@b1quint b1quint merged commit 56b0ea7 into main Nov 14, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
@b1quint b1quint deleted the tickets/SITCOM-1689 branch November 14, 2024 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants