Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: remove unused common utilities #54825

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

RedYetiDev
Copy link
Member

This PR removes files from test/common/... that aren't used in Node.js's testing.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. labels Sep 7, 2024
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
'use strict';
require('../common');
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review note: This was removed because this file doesn't need to load ../common in order to function. I can make a seperate PR if needed.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 7, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.06%. Comparing base (53cdffe) to head (0724727).
Report is 134 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #54825   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.06%   88.06%           
=======================================
  Files         651      651           
  Lines      183387   183387           
  Branches    35794    35802    +8     
=======================================
+ Hits       161494   161497    +3     
+ Misses      15166    15161    -5     
- Partials     6727     6729    +2     

see 31 files with indirect coverage changes

@jasnell jasnell added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 7, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment was marked as outdated.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 8, 2024

This PR is currently blocked from landing due to unreliable CI.

@RedYetiDev
Copy link
Member Author

Is that still the case. The CI LGTM, it passed everything except for a few flakes

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 11, 2024

PR should be rebased with a fresh CI run.

@RedYetiDev
Copy link
Member Author

Rebase complete, can someone start a CI?

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@RedYetiDev RedYetiDev added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Sep 19, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 21, 2024
PR-URL: #54825
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Sep 21, 2024

Landed in 5116578

@jasnell jasnell closed this Sep 21, 2024
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
PR-URL: #54825
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
@aduh95 aduh95 mentioned this pull request Oct 9, 2024
louwers pushed a commit to louwers/node that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#54825
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Moshe Atlow <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants