Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CODEOWNERS: Overhaul in order to enable required reviews #17327

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

carlescufi
Copy link
Contributor

Replaces #15698

In preparation for the enabling of the GitHub "Require reviews from Code Owners" branch protection setting, reorganize the Codeowners file so that Vestavind is aware of changes in the files it needs to oversee.

See also: https://nordicsemi.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SPG/pages/635604878/CODEOWNERS+file

@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Sep 16, 2024
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Sep 16, 2024

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 21

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: df513db8df84a0f6a22f7f7b45f8e30eb7bfe80e

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: df513db8df84a0f6a22f7f7b45f8e30eb7bfe80e
merge base: 0063d04074e9b8927262eee0fecf518b5d2dd7c6
target head (main): cfb2a11d013959f2fa68a1dc9460a1cf1c6fda82
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (1)
CODEOWNERS

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version:
Build docker image:

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain
  • ◻️ Build twister
  • ◻️ Integration tests
Disabled integration tests
    • desktop52_verification
    • doc-internal
    • test_ble_nrf_config
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_nrf_provisioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-proprietary_esb
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
    • test-low-level
    • test-sdk-audio
    • test-sdk-dfu
    • test-sdk-find-my
    • test-sdk-mcuboot
    • test-sdk-pmic-samples
    • test-sdk-sidewalk
    • test-sdk-wifi

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

CODEOWNERS Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated
/lib/gcf_sms/ @eivindj-nordic
/lib/nrf_modem_lib/ @rlubos @lemrey
/lib/gcf_sms/ @nrfconnect/ncs-modem
/lib/nrf_modem_lib/ @nrfconnect/ncs-co-networking @nrfconnect/ncs-modem
/lib/edge_impulse/ @pdunaj
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about allocating this to SI team instead of the team leader?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pdunaj can you please let me know which teams to create?

CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@plskeggs plskeggs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for nrfcloud

CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@thst-nordic thst-nordic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The reason for this overhaul is to allow PR authors to merge small changes faster.

We should aim to replace as many individual accounts with teams to avoid delays due to absences. It looks like good progress towards this already.

@carlescufi
Copy link
Contributor Author

subsys/fw_info and tests/subsys/fw_info should go to Pluto

Fixed

@carlescufi carlescufi force-pushed the codeowners-update branch 2 times, most recently from ff42002 to 1e8e8ed Compare September 17, 2024 12:30
Copy link
Contributor

@hubertmis hubertmis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still, I would replace multiple @pdunaj with relevant teams. But I guess we can do that later.

CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@carlescufi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Still, I would replace multiple @pdunaj with relevant teams. But I guess we can do that later.

Currently discussing it with him

@pdunaj
Copy link
Contributor

pdunaj commented Sep 18, 2024

Still, I would replace multiple @pdunaj with relevant teams. But I guess we can do that later.

Currently discussing it with him

Pushed the change as a commit to this PR. Please squash if ok.

CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@carlescufi carlescufi force-pushed the codeowners-update branch 2 times, most recently from 7b53e4e to 962b5e8 Compare September 19, 2024 09:17
@SeppoTakalo
Copy link
Contributor

@carlescufi

Final changes (hopefully) for my team.
I think these can be assigned to ncs-iot-oulu instead of individuals

  • /samples/cellular/slm_shell/
  • /subsys/net/lib/ftp_client/
  • /lib/modem_jwt/ (maybe ncs-modem as well)
  • /tests/lib/modem_jwt/

In preparation for the enabling of the GitHub "Require reviews from Code
Owners" branch protection setting, reorganize the Codeowners file so
that Vestavind is aware of changes in the files it needs to oversee.

See also: https://nordicsemi.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SPG/pages/635604878/CODEOWNERS+file

Signed-off-by: Carles Cufi <[email protected]>
@carlescufi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@carlescufi

Final changes (hopefully) for my team. I think these can be assigned to ncs-iot-oulu instead of individuals

  • /samples/cellular/slm_shell/
  • /subsys/net/lib/ftp_client/
  • /lib/modem_jwt/ (maybe ncs-modem as well)
  • /tests/lib/modem_jwt/

Done

@carlescufi carlescufi merged commit 1425a59 into nrfconnect:main Sep 19, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.