Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8340456: Reduce overhead of proxying Object methods in ProxyGenerator #21090

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

cl4es
Copy link
Member

@cl4es cl4es commented Sep 19, 2024

This PR changes proxy code gen to avoid generating Class.forName("java.lang.Object"), instead emitting an ldc for the class literal, ldc(CD_Object), java code equivalent Object.class.

More types could profitably use ldc(ClassDesc/-Entry), taking cues from InvokerBytecodeGenerator.isStaticallyInvocable, but just addressing the Object methods gets rid of most Class.forName emits. It's not terribly important for throughput performance since these are called in the generated clinit, so getting a quick win with few additional checks is a good starting point.

Added a few unrelated minor refactors/improvements, guided by diagnostic runs of the now fixed microbenchmark.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8340456: Reduce overhead of proxying Object methods in ProxyGenerator (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21090/head:pull/21090
$ git checkout pull/21090

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/21090
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/21090/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 21090

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 21090

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21090.diff

Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Sep 19, 2024

👋 Welcome back redestad! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2024

@cl4es This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8340456: Reduce overhead of proxying Object methods in ProxyGenerator

Reviewed-by: liach

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 9 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 75d5e11: 8340400: Shenandoah: Whitebox breakpoint GC requests may cause assertions
  • 15ae115: 8340166: [REDO] CDS: Trim down minimum GC region alignment
  • ec3cba0: 8340399: Update comment in SourceVersion for language evolution history
  • d1d8240: 8340308: PassFailJFrame: Make rows default to number of lines in instructions
  • bc36ace: 8340271: Open source several AWT Robot tests
  • 5f3e7aa: 8339735: Remove references to Applet in core-libs/security APIs
  • 2ada313: 8340329: (fs) Message of NotLinkException thrown by FIles.readSymbolicLink does not include file name (win)
  • 3bb8de3: 8338693: assert(Atomic::add(&ik->_shared_class_load_count, 1) == 1) failed: shared class loaded more than once
  • d555f07: 8298614: Support CDS heap dumping for SerialGC and ParallelGC

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Sep 19, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 19, 2024

@cl4es The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

if (cl == Object.class) {
cob.ldc(objectCE);
} else {
cob.ldc(cl.getName())
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This Class.forName is only necessary in a very small number of cases, namely when the overridden interface method has an unaccessible parameter type, usually a package-private type not accessible to the implementing class. Maybe we can always directly ldc if the class is public.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I'm just not sure what rules are quite right here. Wouldn't want to inadvertently regress this again, and not sure we have tests for all eventualities, so I started this off with the most conservative yet most beneficial improvement.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@liach liach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Replacing Class.forName with ldc or even condy is an esoteric topic. We can dive into that later and pick up the obvious gains.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Sep 19, 2024
@cl4es
Copy link
Member Author

cl4es commented Sep 20, 2024

Thanks!

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 20, 2024

Going to push as commit a50440f.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Sep 20, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Sep 20, 2024
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Sep 20, 2024
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Sep 20, 2024

@cl4es Pushed as commit a50440f.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core-libs [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants