Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provision bundles from reference: URLs [PAXRUNNER-399] #409

Closed
ops4j-issues opened this issue Aug 5, 2011 · 4 comments
Closed

Provision bundles from reference: URLs [PAXRUNNER-399] #409

ops4j-issues opened this issue Aug 5, 2011 · 4 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ops4j-issues
Copy link

ops4j-issues commented Aug 5, 2011

Harald Wellmann created PAXRUNNER-399

Pax Runner shall be able to provision bundles from reference: URLs supported by the new pax-url-reference module, see PAXURL-137 .

This protocol is supported by Equinox and Felix, though not an OSGi standard.

Bundles from reference URLs shall not be downloaded to the provisioning area. They shall be provisioned in place from a file: URL wrapped in the reference: URL.


Affects: 1.7.4
Fixed in: 1.7.5
Votes: 0, Watches: 0


Referenced issues

aggregation of:

depends on:

blocks:

is related from:

@ops4j-issues
Copy link
Author

Harald Wellmann commented

  • new dependency on pax-url-reference
  • PAX URL versions changed to 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT
  • added reference: handler to runner properties
  • never download bundles with reference: URLs

ffa4813

@ops4j-issues
Copy link
Author

Toni Menzel commented

Harald, is there a way to not use reference urls (e.g. revert to the old behaviour where bundles are downloaded and referenced from within runner/bundles cache ) ?

@ops4j-issues
Copy link
Author

Harald Wellmann commented

If you don't use reference URLs, you get the old behaviour - Pax Runner does not convert other URLs to reference URLs automatically.

@ops4j-issues
Copy link
Author

Toni Menzel commented

hmm.. actually i was investigating http://team.ops4j.org/browse/PAXRUNNER-405 . Since it broke for them in 1.7.5 i see some relationship. Though i have not been able to reproduced the issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant