Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: Hardcode pip requirements into the Dockerfiles #240

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: canon
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nbraud
Copy link
Contributor

@nbraud nbraud commented Apr 25, 2019

Pro: Works around an issue with the way Cirrus caches containers: cirruslabs/cirrus-ci-docs#273

Cons:

  • Requires regenerating/recommiting Dockerfiles whenever requirements change.
  • This will break if the character ' (rather than ") is used in a requirements file.

Marked as part of project vector-1.0 as it is blocking for #204.

Pro: Works around an issue with the way Cirrus caches containers:
     cirruslabs/cirrus-ci-docs#273

Con:
- Requires regenerating/recommiting Dockerfiles whenever requirements change.
- This will break if the character `'` is used in requirements*.txt
@nbraud nbraud requested a review from pathunstrom April 25, 2019 21:53
@nbraud nbraud requested a review from a team as a code owner April 25, 2019 21:53
@nbraud
Copy link
Contributor Author

nbraud commented Apr 25, 2019

OK, Windows builds fail due to some issue with how quoting works under Powershell...

@AstraLuma AstraLuma mentioned this pull request May 4, 2019
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2019
247: Revert "Merge #225" r=pathunstrom a=astronouth7303

This rolls back the use of CI dockerfiles, so that cirrus brokenness no longer blocks other PRs.

This is not a rejection of #240.

Co-authored-by: Jamie Bliss <[email protected]>
@pathunstrom pathunstrom changed the base branch from master to canon June 27, 2020 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant