-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update time coding tests to assert exact equality #9961
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -65,36 +65,36 @@ | |
_ALL_CALENDARS = sorted(_NON_STANDARD_CALENDARS_SET.union(_STANDARD_CALENDARS)) | ||
_NON_STANDARD_CALENDARS = sorted(_NON_STANDARD_CALENDARS_SET) | ||
_CF_DATETIME_NUM_DATES_UNITS = [ | ||
(np.arange(10), "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(10).astype("float64"), "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(10).astype("float32"), "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(10).reshape(2, 5), "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hours since 1680-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
(np.arange(10), "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(10).astype("float64"), "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(10).astype("float32"), "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(10).reshape(2, 5), "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hours since 1680-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
# here we add a couple minor formatting errors to test | ||
# the robustness of the parsing algorithm. | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "Hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), " Hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00 "), | ||
(10, "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
([10], "daYs since 2000-01-01"), | ||
([[10]], "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
([10, 10], "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(np.array(10), "days since 2000-01-01"), | ||
(0, "days since 1000-01-01"), | ||
([0], "days since 1000-01-01"), | ||
([[0]], "days since 1000-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(2), "days since 1000-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(0, 100000, 20000), "days since 1900-01-01"), | ||
(np.arange(0, 100000, 20000), "days since 1-01-01"), | ||
(17093352.0, "hours since 1-1-1 00:00:0.0"), | ||
([0.5, 1.5], "hours since 1900-01-01T00:00:00"), | ||
(0, "milliseconds since 2000-01-01T00:00:00"), | ||
(0, "microseconds since 2000-01-01T00:00:00"), | ||
(np.int32(788961600), "seconds since 1981-01-01"), # GH2002 | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00.500000"), | ||
(164375, "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
(164374.5, "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
([164374.5, 168360.5], "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "Hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), " Hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00 ", "s"), | ||
(10, "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
([10], "daYs since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
([[10]], "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
([10, 10], "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.array(10), "days since 2000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(0, "days since 1000-01-01", "s"), | ||
([0], "days since 1000-01-01", "s"), | ||
([[0]], "days since 1000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(2), "days since 1000-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(0, 100000, 20000), "days since 1900-01-01", "s"), | ||
(np.arange(0, 100000, 20000), "days since 1-01-01", "s"), | ||
(17093352.0, "hours since 1-1-1 00:00:0.0", "s"), | ||
([0.5, 1.5], "hours since 1900-01-01T00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(0, "milliseconds since 2000-01-01T00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(0, "microseconds since 2000-01-01T00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(np.int32(788961600), "seconds since 1981-01-01", "s"), # GH2002 | ||
(12300 + np.arange(5), "hour since 1680-01-01 00:00:00.500000", "us"), | ||
(164375, "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
(164374.5, "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
([164374.5, 168360.5], "days since 1850-01-01 00:00:00", "s"), | ||
] | ||
_CF_DATETIME_TESTS = [ | ||
num_dates_units + (calendar,) | ||
|
@@ -122,9 +122,15 @@ def _all_cftime_date_types(): | |
@requires_cftime | ||
@pytest.mark.filterwarnings("ignore:Ambiguous reference date string") | ||
@pytest.mark.filterwarnings("ignore:Times can't be serialized faithfully") | ||
@pytest.mark.parametrize(["num_dates", "units", "calendar"], _CF_DATETIME_TESTS) | ||
@pytest.mark.parametrize( | ||
["num_dates", "units", "minimum_resolution", "calendar"], _CF_DATETIME_TESTS | ||
) | ||
def test_cf_datetime( | ||
num_dates, units, calendar, time_unit: PDDatetimeUnitOptions | ||
num_dates, | ||
units: str, | ||
minimum_resolution: PDDatetimeUnitOptions, | ||
calendar: str, | ||
time_unit: PDDatetimeUnitOptions, | ||
) -> None: | ||
import cftime | ||
|
||
|
@@ -137,25 +143,23 @@ def test_cf_datetime( | |
actual = decode_cf_datetime(num_dates, units, calendar, time_unit=time_unit) | ||
|
||
if actual.dtype.kind != "O": | ||
expected = cftime_to_nptime(expected, time_unit=time_unit) | ||
|
||
abs_diff = np.asarray(abs(actual - expected)).ravel() | ||
abs_diff = pd.to_timedelta(abs_diff.tolist()).to_numpy() | ||
if np.timedelta64(1, time_unit) > np.timedelta64(1, minimum_resolution): | ||
expected_unit = minimum_resolution | ||
else: | ||
expected_unit = time_unit | ||
expected = cftime_to_nptime(expected, time_unit=expected_unit) | ||
|
||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual, expected) | ||
encoded1, _, _ = encode_cf_datetime(actual, units, calendar) | ||
|
||
assert_duckarray_allclose(num_dates, encoded1) | ||
assert_array_equal(num_dates, encoded1) | ||
|
||
if hasattr(num_dates, "ndim") and num_dates.ndim == 1 and "1000" not in units: | ||
# verify that wrapping with a pandas.Index works | ||
# note that it *does not* currently work to put | ||
# non-datetime64 compatible dates into a pandas.Index | ||
encoded2, _, _ = encode_cf_datetime(pd.Index(actual), units, calendar) | ||
assert_duckarray_allclose(num_dates, encoded2) | ||
assert_array_equal(num_dates, encoded2) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -206,11 +210,7 @@ def test_decode_cf_datetime_non_iso_strings() -> None: | |
] | ||
for num_dates, units in cases: | ||
actual = decode_cf_datetime(num_dates, units) | ||
abs_diff = abs(actual - expected.values) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ def test_decode_standard_calendar_inside_timestamp_range( | |
) -> None: | ||
import cftime | ||
|
||
units = "days since 0001-01-01" | ||
units = "hours since 0001-01-01" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Using encoding units of "days" unnecessarily led the times to be encoded with floats, which prevented asserting exact equality in this test. Testing floating point time decoding was not the point of this test, so I changed to encoding the times with units of "hours" instead. |
||
times = pd.date_range( | ||
"2001-04-01-00", end="2001-04-30-23", unit=time_unit, freq="h" | ||
) | ||
|
@@ -233,11 +233,7 @@ def test_decode_standard_calendar_inside_timestamp_range( | |
# representable with nanosecond resolution. | ||
actual = decode_cf_datetime(time, units, calendar=calendar, time_unit=time_unit) | ||
assert actual.dtype == np.dtype(f"=M8[{time_unit}]") | ||
abs_diff = abs(actual - expected) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -256,11 +252,7 @@ def test_decode_non_standard_calendar_inside_timestamp_range(calendar) -> None: | |
|
||
actual = decode_cf_datetime(non_standard_time, units, calendar=calendar) | ||
assert actual.dtype == expected_dtype | ||
abs_diff = abs(actual - expected) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -287,11 +279,7 @@ def test_decode_dates_outside_timestamp_range( | |
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore", "Unable to decode time axis") | ||
actual = decode_cf_datetime(time, units, calendar=calendar, time_unit=time_unit) | ||
assert all(isinstance(value, expected_date_type) for value in actual) | ||
abs_diff = abs(actual - expected) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff <= np.timedelta64(1, "us")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual, expected) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -367,14 +355,8 @@ def test_decode_standard_calendar_multidim_time_inside_timestamp_range( | |
mdim_time, units, calendar=calendar, time_unit=time_unit | ||
) | ||
assert actual.dtype == np.dtype(f"=M8[{time_unit}]") | ||
|
||
abs_diff1 = abs(actual[:, 0] - expected1) | ||
abs_diff2 = abs(actual[:, 1] - expected2) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff1 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert (abs_diff2 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 0], expected1) | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 1], expected2) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -409,13 +391,8 @@ def test_decode_nonstandard_calendar_multidim_time_inside_timestamp_range( | |
actual = decode_cf_datetime(mdim_time, units, calendar=calendar) | ||
|
||
assert actual.dtype == expected_dtype | ||
abs_diff1 = abs(actual[:, 0] - expected1) | ||
abs_diff2 = abs(actual[:, 1] - expected2) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff1 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert (abs_diff2 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 0], expected1) | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 1], expected2) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
@@ -455,14 +432,8 @@ def test_decode_multidim_time_outside_timestamp_range( | |
dtype = np.dtype(f"=M8[{time_unit}]") | ||
|
||
assert actual.dtype == dtype | ||
|
||
abs_diff1 = abs(actual[:, 0] - expected1) | ||
abs_diff2 = abs(actual[:, 1] - expected2) | ||
# once we no longer support versions of netCDF4 older than 1.1.5, | ||
# we could do this check with near microsecond accuracy: | ||
# https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/355 | ||
assert (abs_diff1 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert (abs_diff2 <= np.timedelta64(1, "s")).all() | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 0], expected1) | ||
assert_array_equal(actual[:, 1], expected2) | ||
|
||
|
||
@requires_cftime | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I needed to add this logic specifically for this test:
This is because the reference date required the dates be decoded to microsecond resolution (really only millisecond resolution would be required, but we follow pandas's lead here). Otherwise for
time_unit="s"
we would truncate precision when converting the cftime objects tonp.datetime64
values, which prevented asserting exact equality.