GH-113655: Lower the C recursion limit for all big-endian platforms #124264
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…orms We currently reduce the C recursion limit just for s390x (which is big-endian), but in Gentoo, we hit the same issues on ppc64be, hppa, and sparc. At least for ppc64, it seems like the ABI used on ppc64be means you end up with bigger stack frames. Just set it to a sensible, conservative value for all BE platforms.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We currently reduce the C recursion limit just for s390x (which is big-endian),
but in Gentoo, we hit the same issues on ppc64be, hppa, and sparc.
At least for ppc64, it seems like the ABI used on ppc64be means you end
up with bigger stack frames.
Just set it to a sensible, conservative value for all BE platforms.