Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: test codereview ci #3

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

chore: test codereview ci #3

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rax-it
Copy link
Owner

@rax-it rax-it commented Aug 23, 2023

No description provided.

queryParameters:
optionalParam:
type: string
required: false No newline at end of file

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to define a RAML API specification for a "Test" API. It includes a single resource /test-entity/{id} with a GET method that retrieves a TestEntity. The TestEntity has an id property of type string. The GET request can also accept an optional query parameter named optionalParam.

As for improvements, it would be beneficial to include more detailed descriptions, add error responses, and consider defining additional resources and methods to make the API more functional and realistic. Additionally, adding security definitions and documenting the API endpoints using RAML annotations would enhance the specification.

/{id}:
get:
(luvio.adapter):
name: getTestEntity No newline at end of file

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code appears to be defining a RAML overlay file. Here are a few suggestions:

  1. Specify a meaningful title for the overlay.
  2. Ensure that the overlay extends the correct base RAML file.
  3. Review and verify the usage of the "luvio" annotation and ensure it is correctly referenced.
  4. Consider providing a more descriptive key prefix instead of "prefix" in the (luvio.keyPrefix) annotation.
  5. Pay attention to the specified TTL value, as a value of 0 may not provide sufficient time for caching operations.

Please note that the provided code excerpt seems incomplete, so further review may be required to identify any additional bug risks or improvement areas.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant