Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Provide a .rpm file for Fedora #1139

Open
jhpratt opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 8 comments · May be fixed by #1234
Open

Provide a .rpm file for Fedora #1139

jhpratt opened this issue Jul 28, 2021 · 8 comments · May be fixed by #1234

Comments

@jhpratt
Copy link

jhpratt commented Jul 28, 2021

Would it be possible to provide a .rpm file for Fedora and possibly publish to the relevant repository? Having a .appimage works, but it's not ideal for those of us that prefer to have things fully installed; while AppImageLauncher works, it feels like quite the hack. I have tried the snap installation but it freezes and crashes constantly. The only alternative is to use Zulip on the web, which isn't preferable.

@timabbott timabbott transferred this issue from zulip/zulip Jul 28, 2021
@timabbott
Copy link
Member

Transferred to the desktop repository, since this is an issue for the desktop repository.

I think electron-builder supports RPM as a target, so it might not be too hard to do that.

@jhpratt
Copy link
Author

jhpratt commented Jul 28, 2021

Awesome. Thanks for the transfer, given that I didn't bother to check if other repos existed.

@byoungb
Copy link

byoungb commented Nov 12, 2021

I would like to second this... since it is an electron app it is as simple as adding it to the build options!...

I have been building my own RPMs by adding rpm as a target to the linux build options in package.json and running npm run dist

I like the RPM because it handles the desktop files and everything for you which is nicer then having to set that all up manually with the AppImage

@andersk
Copy link
Member

andersk commented Nov 12, 2021

Not saying we’re opposed to providing an RPM, but in case it helps: you can install AppImageLauncher to get automatic desktop file integration when you open an AppImage.

We also have a Flatpak on Flathub. (Previously we didn’t officially recommend this because it lagged somewhat behind the release version, but I now have maintainer access so we’ll make sure it stays updated.)

@jhpratt
Copy link
Author

jhpratt commented Nov 13, 2021

I personally use the flatpak version right now. The only issue I've encountered is the lack of a tray icon (right now it's just the default triple dots). If the flatpak is going to be officially recommended as an option, I can close this and just ask that the tray icon be added.

@dexpl
Copy link

dexpl commented Dec 2, 2021

I'd like to second this as well: please, do it. Not saying I'm strictly against appimage or flatpak but Zulip Desktop is the sole item of software I have to use AppImage or Flatpak for. If building rpm is not very difficult, please provide it.

@batistein batistein linked a pull request Oct 7, 2022 that will close this issue
3 tasks
@batistein
Copy link

I added a PR which adds an rpm target. It's already successfully used by several people for about a month. See: https://github.com/batistein/zulip-desktop/releases

@brandonr49
Copy link

I would also really appreciate an rpm target generally available for Zulip. We've been happily using it for almost a year and it's the only reason I have to deal with any AppImage/Flatpak. If there's any way to help make this a reality (I can see there's already the pull request) I am happy to assist.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants