Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove cache server test download #304

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025
Merged

Remove cache server test download #304

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 7, 2025

Conversation

tyler-yankee
Copy link
Contributor

@tyler-yankee tyler-yankee commented Feb 7, 2025

While working through #22587 it was determined that this section of code doesn't really make sense in general. It tests a download from the cache server and opts to not use it if the download fails, rather than failing the entire build. But the entire build should just fail at that point; this way, errors are easier to track down.


This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@BetsyMcPhail BetsyMcPhail left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Has this been tested out on an experimental job to catch any typos, etc. ?

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @tyler-yankee)

@tyler-yankee
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, was just waiting on that job to finish. mac-arm-sequoia-clang-cmake-experimental-release is happy.

Copy link
Contributor

@BetsyMcPhail BetsyMcPhail left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @tyler-yankee)

@BetsyMcPhail BetsyMcPhail merged commit 6950867 into main Feb 7, 2025
1 check passed
@BetsyMcPhail BetsyMcPhail deleted the remote-cache branch February 7, 2025 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants