feat: keep track of kcat curations #385
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Main improvements in this PR:
sensitivityTuning
modifies a kcat value, it will now be indicated inmodel.ec.source
as 'sensitivityTuning', and the previous kcat value and source will be kept in themodel.ec.notes
field aspreTuneKcat=*value* | source:*original source*
. If the kcat value had been subjected tosenstivityTuning
before, then the notes field will remain unchanged, so repeated runs ofsensitivityTuning
will not overwrite the notes.obj.params.uniprot.reviewed
parameter in theadapterTemplate
is set tofalse
, to increase the number of matching proteins.model.ec.source
entry after runningsetKcatForReactions
has been corrected to 'setKcatForReactions'.README.md
.obj.params.enzyme_comp
in model adapter (solves GECKO Model Adapter. Is it possible to define more than one compartment with the parameter 'obj.params.enzyme_comp' ? #386)Instructions on merging this PR:
develop
as target branch, and will be resolved with a squash-merge.main
as target branch, and will be resolved with a merge commit.